The First City

If you saw yesterday's post on city rights, you might wonder: if they weren't already, when was the first "city" thought of as such? Wasn't Rome already a city?

Well yes, cities existed before the Middle Ages. In the growing feudalism north of the Alps, however, a powerful noble claimed control over all the lands he could conquer, or that he was given by a higher-ranking noble. Giving up that power wasn't common. When a municipality proved itself to be especially valuable, however, they might be allowed some self-governance. The first such place north of the Alps was Huy, from Latin Hoius vicus, "Hoyoux village." 

It had an ideal location, at the mouth of the River Hoyoux where it joined the larger River Meuse, making transportation of goods easy. From the original Roman camp, it was evangelized by St. Domitian, the "Apostle of the Meuse Valley," in the 6th century. Legend says he delivered the area from the ravages of a dragon.

Huy also became known for tanning, woodworking, and wine, making it one of the most prosperous cities along the river. When the local office of bishop became a prince of the Holy Roman Empire in 985, Huy and the area around it became its own county, with a count appointed by the bishop to administer it.

By this time it already had a market; we know this because records of King Childeric III in 743 gave an exemption to some monks from the toll paid on goods sold at the market. (That was kind of Childeric, since these tolls—essentially a sales tax—provided a healthy source of revenue for royal coffers.) Revenues from Huy were sufficient that King Lothair II in 862 diverted some to the double monastery of Stavelot-Malmedy. In 890 its status was upgraded with the construction of a fortress on a hill. (The illustration shows the castle as it appeared c.1600.)

We don't know what the tipping point was. It was overseen by a series of counts, but under Count Conon in 1066 it was granted the first known city rights charter north of the Alps.

Huy was one of the areas Peter the Hermit wandered through to drum up support for the First Crusade and the People's Crusade. The textile industry was an enormous source of its power and revenue in the 13th and 14th centuries.

One of its strengths—its strategic position on the rivers—made it a target during the wars of Louis XIV, and it suffered so much that the residents dismantled the castle themselves in 1715 to eliminate its military value. A modern citadel exists on the hill now.

When power transfers hands, someone suffers. What was Count Conon like, and was it difficult for him to have such a gem removed from his governance? Let's take a look at this obscure Count of Montaigu tomorrow.

Long Hair and Kingship

Gregory of Tours mentions, regarding an event in which the body of King Clovis I was exhumed, "Though I did not know who he was, I recognised from the length of the hair that it was Clovis." Elsewhere he refers to theFranks as reges criniti, the "long-haired kings." The post just prior to this tells of a choice offered to a queen to have princes shorn or killed; she chooses killed rather than the shame of princes who are shorn of their locks and therefore denied the chance to some day rule. Gregory tells another anecdote of King Clovis defeating a rival king who betrayed him, Chararic, cutting short the hair of him and his son and confining them in a monastery. When it was later reported to Clovis that the son had remarked to his father that they should grow their hair long again, Clovis had them killed.

Human cultures have developed many ways to indicate social cues, and hair length and style has certainly been one way to distinguish the upper from the lower echelons, but the Merovingians took it to an entirely new level.

We have every reason to believe that the Franks, like the Romans, kept their hair short, so the Merovingian line of royalty would have stood out from the common folk. It was not necessary that the hair had never been cut, just that it was long. Why this was so, we cannot say for certain. Some suggest it is simply a distinction between the Germanic military culture and the Roman religious culture of the various peoples that the Merovingians conquered, but that is too simplistic to be accurate.

When the Merovingian kings began to become lazy, their "Mayors of the Palace" managed their affairs, effectively running the kingdom. The last Merovingian king was Childeric III, whose Mayor of the Palace was Charles Martel, the "Hammer." According to Charlemagne's biographer Einhard, Charles allowed Childeric "to sit on his throne, content with the name of king only, with his long hair and flowing beard, and give the appearance of sovereignty." Eventually, Martel's son, Pepin the Short, took the throne with the backing of Pope Zachary. He had Childeric tonsured and sent with his also-shorn son Theuderic to separate monasteries.

You may recall in the post on Childebert how his brother Chlodomer was killed in battle against Burgundy. A Byzantine historian, Agathias, writes a contemporary account of the battle, giving us a little more on the attitude toward hairstyles in different cultures:

And when he fell, the Burgundians, seeing his hair flowing and abundant, loose down to his back, at once realised that they had killed the enemy leader. For it is the rule for Frankish kings never to be shorn; instead, their hair is never cut from childhood on, and hangs down in abundance on their shoulders. Their front hair, is parted on the forehead and falls down on either side. Their hair is not uncombed and dry and dirty and braided up in a messy knot like that of the Turks and Avars; instead, they anoint it with unguents of different sorts, and carefully comb it. Now this it is their custom to set apart as a distinguishing mark and special prerogative for the royal house. For their subjects have their hair cut all round, and are not permitted to grow it further.

The few seals of Merovingian kings that we have show the long hair, parted in the middle. Hair styles among the common folk might have been varied, but notably long hair was reserved for, and crucial to, the Merovingian royalty.

Now for another of those names I feel I have neglected: Einhard is significant because of his life of Charlemagne, and I'll tell you more next time.